Melatonin in the Prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Workers (MeCOVID): A Randomised Clinical Trial.

We evaluated in this randomised, double-blind clinical trial the efficacy of melatonin as a prophylactic treatment for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Healthcare workers fulfilling inclusion criteria were recruited in five hospitals in Spain and were randomised 1:1 to receive melatonin 2 mg administered orally for 12 weeks or placebo. The main outcome was the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections. A total of 344 volunteers were screened, and 314 were randomised: 151 to placebo and 163 to melatonin; 308 received the study treatment (148 placebo; 160 melatonin). We detected 13 SARS-CoV-2 infections, 2.6% in the placebo arm and 5.5% in the melatonin arm (p = 0.200). A total of 294 adverse events were detected in 127 participants (139 in placebo; 155 in melatonin). We found a statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse events related to treatment: 43 in the placebo arm and 67 in the melatonin arm (p = 0.040), and in the number of participants suffering from somnolence related to treatment: 8.8% (n = 14) in the melatonin versus 1.4% (n = 2) in the placebo arm (p = 0.008). No severe adverse events related to treatment were reported. We cannot confirm our hypothesis that administration of melatonin prevents the development of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers.

[Endonasal endoscopic surgery in pituitary adenomas: Surgical results in a series of 86 consecutive patients]. / Cirugía endoscópica endonasal en adenomas hipofisarios: resultados quirúrgicos en una serie de 86 pacientes consecutivos.

INTRODUCTION: The endoscopic endonasal approach has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of pituitary adenomas. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to present the results obtained in our hospital in purely endoscopic surgery of pituitary adenomas. METHODS: From February 2011 to August 2016, we conducted a prospective study on a series of 86 patients with pituitary adenoma, all of whom underwent surgery with a purely endoscopic endonasal approach. The 'four hands-two nostrils' technique was performed in all cases by a surgical team composed of an ENT surgeon and a neurosurgeon. Mean follow-up was 32 months. All patients were evaluated according to clinical, radiological and endocrinological criteria. RESULTS: In our series, 53% were women and 47% men. The age ranged from 14 to 84 years of age, with a mean of 54 years of age. The most common initial symptom was visual deficit (42%), followed by hormonal hyperfunction (21%), with acromegaly being the most common clinical syndrome. The most common tumours were non-functioning tumours (73%), while GH-secreting tumours (65%) were the most common functioning adenoma. Regarding tumour size, 76% were macroadenomas, 11% microadenomas and 13% giant adenomas. Approximately 63% of the adenomas exhibited suprasellar extension and 37% involved invasion of the cavernous sinus (Knosp grade ≥3). Total excision was achieved in 77% of the cases. After the intervention, visual improvement was achieved in 91% and remission of endocrine hyperfunction in up to a 73% of cases. The most common complication was anterior pituitary insufficiency of at least one axis (9%). There were no cases of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid fistula. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of surgical quality, our results are similar to those of published series, and demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the endoscopic endonasal approach as the surgical treatment of choice for pituitary adenomas. However, further studies with a higher sample size are necessary to obtain clinically significant results.